tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463466213945068980.post7057416328553689624..comments2009-09-30T14:44:04.745-04:00Comments on Leica Year: SecondsR.http://www.blogger.com/profile/03522112268503563893noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463466213945068980.post-16253624861122853212009-06-22T21:18:29.460-04:002009-06-22T21:18:29.460-04:00This image isn't a multiple exposure. It's...This image isn't a multiple exposure. It's a a translucent advertising banner on a fence in front of a vacant lot.<br /><br />However, to do multiple exposure with the M6, see comment to a previous post, <a href="http://leicayear.blogspot.com/2009/06/another-look-at-black-and-white.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.R.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03522112268503563893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463466213945068980.post-65294329516072056342009-06-22T15:59:19.017-04:002009-06-22T15:59:19.017-04:00how'd you do multi-exposure? I didn't see...how'd you do multi-exposure? I didn't see an obvious way to do it on my m6. So far i've failed at getting my 2nd roll developed. I need to get caught up!Daniel Garciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11483260131204548135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463466213945068980.post-31863830405773745932009-06-22T03:19:53.210-04:002009-06-22T03:19:53.210-04:00Lack of shadowdetail whilst scanning is a problem ...Lack of shadowdetail whilst scanning is a problem I've encountered with slides a lot, so it's possible (though common sense says with negatives, it should be a lack of highlight detail).<br /><br />Simplest way to test would be to look at the negatives (use an inverted 50mm as a loupe) and/or make a print.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com